777maxism

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Netbalancer: Routing public IPs behind LAN #51091

    777maxism
    Member

    Would look like my scheme, the real Ip replaced by Ip type (1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.2/30, etc.).

    Real subnetwork get on channel A Real IPs (4.4.4.x/24)

    In configuring (Linux) in this case should be turned off NAT and routing is enabled. Further, the interface rl0 should be spelled out two un 192.168.0.254 looking at a subnet (192.168.0.x/24) and real-subnet 4.4.4.254 looking at a subnet (4.4.4.x/24). Further, all is clear for configuring the server (Linux).

    We proceed to set up ZS.
    We go in (router) and create a rule in our example, they look so :
    Destination:192.168.0.0 Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 3.3.3.2 Metric 1
    Destination:4.4.4.0 Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 3.3.3.2 Metric 1

    To start off (NAT) with interface (ETH01)

    Next, we go in (Net Balantser) create a (Balancing Rules) rule in which we write
    (Source IP: 4.4.4.0/24) on
    (Destination IP: 0.0.0.0 / 0)
    (TARGET GATEVAY: GW-A)
    This rule, we have sent all the traffic from the network (4.4.4.x/24) on interface (ET01)

    Then go to (Setup–>Startup/Kron–> NAT and Virtual Servers script) and put this rule:
    iptables-t nat-A POSTROUTING-s 192.168.0.0/24-o ETH01-j SNAT – to-source 1.1.1.2

    It is necessary for that would be a subnet (192.168.0.0/24) could get through this interface.

    After the restart ZS !!!

    Well, something like this, I do not mostak write instructions can someone will correct me or offer his own version … All thanks for your attention ..

    in reply to: Outbound NAT to a specific IP #51457

    777maxism
    Member

    up

    in reply to: Outbound NAT to a specific IP #51455

    777maxism
    Member

    Yes, I almost forgot in the beginning need to add IP address on an interface.

    ETH00 1000Mb/s Full Duplex
    Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) UP
    VLAN: 771 (Inet_1)
    9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0
    9.9.9.2 255.255.255.0
    9.9.9.3 255.255.255.0

    In (Net Balancer) to prescribe rules for the Local IP and send them to the appropriate interface.
    * * MARK all opt — in * out * 10.55.0.62 -> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x68 Inet_1 (9.9.9.254)
    * * MARK all opt — in * out * 10.55.0.57 -> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x68 Inet_1 (9.9.9.254)
    * * MARK all opt — in * out * 10.55.0.172 -> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x68 Inet_1 (9.9.9.254)

    in reply to: Outbound NAT to a specific IP #51454

    777maxism
    Member

    If I understand correctly then this is what you need.
    Zahodish (Startup / Krohn) there choose section (NAT and Virtual Servers) and Enable section, insert the rules, change the value of their own, at the end restart Zeroshell.

    # incoming rules
    iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING 1 -d 9.9.9.1 -i ETH00.771 -j DNAT –to-destination 10.55.0.62
    iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING 1 -d 9.9.9.2 -i ETH00.771 -j DNAT –to-destination 10.55.0.57
    iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING 1 -d 9.9.9.3 -i ETH00.771 -j DNAT –to-destination 10.55.0.172

    # Outgoing rules
    iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING 1 -s 10.55.0.62 -o ETH00.771 -j SNAT –to-source 9.9.9.1
    iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING 1 -s 10.55.0.57 -o ETH00.771 -j SNAT –to-source 9.9.9.2
    iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING 1 -s 10.55.0.172 -o ETH00.771 -j SNAT –to-source 9.9.9.3

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50625

    777maxism
    Member

    @ppalias wrote:

    Better post it in the BUGS section of the forum.

    ok.
    Thank you all the problem was resolved.
    Solution installation and configuration ZS v13 from zero.
    Most likely problems in the old config file from version ZS v12.

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50623

    777maxism
    Member

    up

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50622

    777maxism
    Member

    @ppalias wrote:

    I wonder if it is a bug of the number of total connections. Can you temporerily erase another connection so that with Optima3 you got 6 connections in total? Or only Optima3 has a problem regardless the number of total connections? Can you post a screenshot of Optima3 connection in Netbalancer?

    Hi, this is again, I am the problem. I found myself ZS V13 problem remained and he had found the cause, it is connected with the number of 6 records. In the installation 5 locks work properly, as soon as you enter your 6 gateway status (Failover Monitor) value appears (Status: Not Running).
    Screened for V12, V13.
    Perhaps even that is a bug v12 because, I configuration backup with version v12 and v13 versions installed on.

    in reply to: VLAN creation on ZS #50704

    777maxism
    Member

    @spitz wrote:

    Is there any way to create vlans in zeroshell ?

    Example:
    Setup->Network->ETH00->Create Vlan

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50621

    777maxism
    Member

    @ppalias wrote:

    I wonder if it is a bug of the number of total connections. Can you temporerily erase another connection so that with Optima3 you got 6 connections in total? Or only Optima3 has a problem regardless the number of total connections? Can you post a screenshot of Optima3 connection in Netbalancer?

    Well I’ll try, lay out the screenshots.

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50619

    777maxism
    Member

    @ppalias wrote:

    You mean that if you disable ppp1 from the Netbalancer you have everything else working fine?

    Yes, exactly.
    And I re-created in the Net Balancer this gateway to the new, the result is the same …
    This it self is the connection is fully working.
    Probably what is a bug in version …

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50617

    777maxism
    Member

    Interesting situation … I knew about where the problem but did not understand why? In the picture if you look there (Gateway – Optima3 Interface ppp1) So if you turn it off then it works … And when you turn off just this (Gateway) in the other versions, if left enabled (Geteway Optima3) in status is not running.

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50615

    777maxism
    Member

    http://rapidshare.com/files/405081749/ZS12_failover_new.JPG
    something that has issued
    I think reinstall the version on the ZS 13 may issue goes …

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50613

    777maxism
    Member

    In the logs wrote:

    11:18:04 Default Route has been changed: nexthop via 212.3.96.x weight 10 realm 100 nexthop dev ppp0 weight 98 realm 103 nexthop via 193.200.33.x weight 99 realm 104 nexthop via 85.198.133.x weight 1 realm 105 nexthop via 192.168.192.1 weight 95 realm 106 nexthop via 85.198.133.x weight 2 realm 107 nexthop dev ppp1 weight 90 realm 108
    11:18:04 Failover monitor has started
    11:18:08 Default Route has been changed: nexthop via 193.200.33.x weight 99 realm 104
    11:18:08 Failover monitor has started

    11:18:05 SUCCESS: Net Balancer configuration successfully saved
    11:18:09 SUCCESS: Net Balancer configuration successfully saved

    But it says Status: Not Running

    And what is the error in the logs? They do not relate to the Failover Monitor.

    11:18:00 message repeated 65 times
    11:18:01 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:04 message repeated 9 times
    11:18:04 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:06 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:08 message repeated 6 times
    11:18:08 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:08 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:09 APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
    11:18:40 message repeated 87 times
    11:19:00 message repeated 60 times

    in reply to: The problem with NetBalancer #50611

    777maxism
    Member

    Sorry this Ukrainian exchanger.
    I restarted here
    http://rapidshare.com/files/405017946/ZS12_failover.JPG

    in reply to: Routing Table #50627

    777maxism
    Member

    1. Profile activated correctly.
    2. Other changes saved after a reboot.
    3. Interface to which it belongs IP 192.168.0.1 up …

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)