Home Page › Forums › Network Management › ZeroShell › ZeroShell Router with QoS
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 13, 2007 at 8:02 pm #40828
guiseppe
MemberHi there,
I am new to ZeroShell, i am using it as a router which has 5 ethernets.
eth0 is connected to the uplink
eth1 is connected to the downlink
eth2 , 3 & 4 are connected to routers serving clients.Router is functioning very well but when I tried to use QoS using Layer 7 marking it doesn’t count in the stats.
Here’s what i have in the classifier:
Seq Input Output Description QoS Class Log Active
1 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto http MARK set 0xb HTTP no
2 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto msn-filetransfer MARK set 0xc MSN no
3 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto msnmessenger MARK set 0xc MSN no
4 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto yahoo MARK set 0xc MSN no
5 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto ssl MARK set 0xb HTTP no
6 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto h323 MARK set 0xd VOIP no
7 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto sip MARK set 0xd VOIP no
8 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto skypeout MARK set 0xd VOIP no
9 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto skypetoskype MARK set 0xd VOIP no
10 * * MARK all opt — in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 ipp2p v0.8.2 –kazaa –gnu –edk –dc –bit MARK set 0xe P2P noand this is what i have on eth0
ETH00 100Mb/s Full Duplex
Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
On
QoS Status:Disabled Max:14Mbit/s Guaranteed:12Mbit/s (Assigned:50%)
Class Description Priority Max Bandwidth Guaranteed On
DEFAULT Default class for unclassified traffic Medium
HTTP HTTP High 6Mbit/s 5.5Mbit/s
P2P P2P Low 1Mbit/s 512Kbit/seth0 is the uplink i was testing but it’s not working. stats is only counting the DEFAULT class only HTTP is not being counted.
Any clues why? or maybe i am doing something wrong.
Best regards,
November 13, 2007 at 9:26 pm #46020grunties
MemberI have the same behavior as you report. I’ve seen other posts in the forums where the 2nd and 3rd column have rates in them…
Dave
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.