I would hope so as development would proceed faster.
I fully agree. I like Zeroshell and its features and I would love rather to be able to track and test what is being developed than to wait until a new relase comes out. It is difficult when a project is almost entirely in the hands of a single person (Fulvio in this case). Everything depends on that person and loads of repsonsibility sit with that person. A more open development process would not only distribute the development load and utilize resources, it would minimize the risk of the whole project going down if that single person for whatever reason drops out.
This last point is very important for people who use ZeroShell in productive business environments.
I have not released the source of the html render engine (kerbynet). I am thinking if I’ll release it as GPL or not. Probably, next release will include the license of kerbynet that in any case will be free when distributed with Zeroshell.
It is already possible to implement new feature without changing kerbynet by using the Action=Object in the URL and executing the scripts with the tag with root privileges and with not root privileges. I’m working to produce some documentation to make this easier.