Port Forwarding Protocol

› Forums › Network Management › Request a new feature › Port Forwarding Protocol

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 11, 2008 at 12:16 am #41024
    flaxx
    Member

    I don’t know if this has been mentioned. But it would be nice if under the protocol section (in Port Forwarding) we could select “Both” as some applications may use either UDP or TCP (and some I don’t even know).

    October 26, 2008 at 2:59 pm #46463
    adnan25
    Member

    @flaxx wrote:

    I don’t know if this has been mentioned. But it would be nice if under the protocol section (in Port Forwarding) we could select “Both” as some applications may use either UDP or TCP (and some I don’t even know).

    I totally agree.

    It would be nice to edit Previous entries and have a description column to say what the forwarding is for.

    Sometimes i forward range of ports which I can’t do at the moment.

    October 7, 2009 at 1:08 am #46464
    Smokeshow
    Member

    I definitely agree with these suggestions. Its a pain to forward a range of ports right now. And then when I have to make changes, it is a hassle to figure out what is already forwarded.

    October 7, 2009 at 3:23 pm #46465
    ppalias
    Member

    The TCP/UDP and port range issue have been fixed. 🙂

    October 8, 2009 at 1:27 am #46466
    Smokeshow
    Member

    @ppalias wrote:

    The TCP/UDP and port range issue have been fixed. 🙂

    Have they? I guess that is a good enough reason for me to upgrade to R12. I’ve been running r11 on all of my machines since it was released and most of them have an uptime of nearly one year.

    October 8, 2009 at 4:05 pm #46467
    ppalias
    Member

    There was a patch on b11, but on b12 it is fixed.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.