Reply To: USB network adapters working with zeroshell?

Home Page Forums Network Management ZeroShell USB network adapters working with zeroshell? Reply To: USB network adapters working with zeroshell?

#52973

reaperz
Member

I did try 3.3.7 kernel now and here is the log:

Cheap chinese USB:

01:38:06 usb 4-2: new full-speed USB device number 2 using uhci_hcd
01:38:07 usb 4-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0fe6, idProduct=9700
01:38:07 usb 4-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
01:38:07 usb 4-2: Product: USB 2.0 10/100M Ethernet Adaptor
01:38:07 dm9601 4-2:1.0: eth0: register ‘dm9601’ at usb-0000:00:1d.2-2, Davicom DM9601 USB Ethernet, 00:e0:4c:53:44:58
01:38:07 usbcore: registered new interface driver dm9601
01:38:37 usb 4-2: USB disconnect, device number 2
01:38:37 dm9601 4-2:1.0: eth0: unregister ‘dm9601’ usb-0000:00:1d.2-2, Davicom DM9601 USB Ethernet

Belkin Gigabit USB:

01:38:43 usb 1-6: new high-speed USB device number 6 using ehci_hcd
01:38:43 usb 1-6: New USB device found, idVendor=050d, idProduct=5055
01:38:43 usb 1-6: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
01:38:43 usb 1-6: Product: F5D5055
01:38:43 usb 1-6: Manufacturer: Belkin F5D5055 Gig USB
01:38:43 usb 1-6: SerialNumber: 000001
01:38:44 asix 1-6:1.0: eth0: register ‘asix’ at usb-0000:00:1d.7-6, ASIX AX88178 USB 2.0 Ethernet, 00:11:50:e7:54:cf
01:38:44 usbcore: registered new interface driver asix
01:39:12 usb 1-6: USB disconnect, device number 6
01:39:12 asix 1-6:1.0: eth0: unregister ‘asix’ usb-0000:00:1d.7-6, ASIX AX88178 USB 2.0 Ethernet

Different chinese USB:

01:39:15 usb 1-6: new high-speed USB device number 7 using ehci_hcd
01:39:16 usb 1-6: New USB device found, idVendor=066b, idProduct=20f9
01:39:16 usb 1-6: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
01:39:16 usb 1-6: Product: HG20F9 USB2.0
01:39:16 usb 1-6: Manufacturer: USBLINK
01:39:16 usb 1-6: SerialNumber: 000003
01:39:35 usb 1-6: USB disconnect, device number 7

But I get nothing in Networking tab. Any idea, what I am I doing wrong?